|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 13-17
Use of over-the-counter topical medications in dermatophytosis: A cross-sectional, single-center, pilot study from a tertiary care hospital
Rajeshwari Dabas, Manasa Shettisara Janney, Radhakrishnan Subramaniyan, Sandeep Arora, V Sandeep Lal, Navya Donaparthi
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Command Hospital Air Force, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
|Date of Web Publication||10-Jul-2018|
Dr. Manasa Shettisara Janney
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Command Hospital Air Force, Old Airport Road, Bengaluru - 560 007, Karnataka
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Dermatophytosis is a common, superficial fungal infection of the skin. In developing countries like India, casual attitude toward seeking medical attention and lax drug control policies lead to indiscriminate use of irrational over-the-counter (OTC) medications. Studies on OTC topical medication abuse in dermatophytosis are lacking despite its frequent occurrence. Aims: To assess the magnitude of OTC topical medication use in dermatophytosis by studying the demographic variables, source of prescription, and their adverse effects. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional, observational, questionnaire-based pilot study was carried out in a tertiary care center. One hundred consecutive, mycologically confirmed dermatophytosis patients were questioned about the use of OTC medications and examined for adverse effects of the preparations used. Results were documented in a predesigned pro forma and the data were expressed in terms of means and proportions. Results: The study population consisted of 75 males and 25 females. Tinea cruris was the most common pattern observed. Only 32% of the patients consulted a dermatologist on developing a rash, whereas the majority (68%) used medicines suggested by others. Clobetasol-based preparations were commonly misused, and 63.23% of the study population experienced adverse effects. Furthermore, majority (89%) of the study population were unaware of steroids and their adverse effects. Conclusions: The growing threat of OTC drug abuse in India is evident from this study. Stringent drug control policies and awareness of adverse effects of OTC topical medication abuse are truly the need of the hour to control this menace.
Keywords: Dermatophytosis, drug abuse, over-the-counter topical medication
|How to cite this article:|
Dabas R, Janney MS, Subramaniyan R, Arora S, Lal V S, Donaparthi N. Use of over-the-counter topical medications in dermatophytosis: A cross-sectional, single-center, pilot study from a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Drugs Dermatol 2018;4:13-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Dabas R, Janney MS, Subramaniyan R, Arora S, Lal V S, Donaparthi N. Use of over-the-counter topical medications in dermatophytosis: A cross-sectional, single-center, pilot study from a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Drugs Dermatol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2020 Oct 28];4:13-7. Available from: https://www.ijdd.in/text.asp?2018/4/1/13/236289
| Introduction|| |
Dermatophytosis is one of the most prevalent public health problems in developing countries like India. Once an easily curable infection, its treatment has now become challenging, which is attributable to changing climatic conditions, westernization, casual health-seeking attitude, and lax drug control policies in India facilitating over-the-counter (OTC) topical medication abuse. Indiscriminate use of irrational topical fixed drug combinations (FDCs) alters the clinical presentation, evokes an irritant response, and contributes to resilience of fungi, resulting in recurrences, chronicity, and probably resistance to antifungal agents.
Commonly available OTC topical medications for “itchy skin rash” include FDC creams containing steroid, antibiotic, and antifungal agents. Preparations containing irritants such as dithranol, salicylic acid, and herbal ingredients are also frequently used by patients who do not wish to visit the doctor and indulge in self-medication due to easy availability of such medications. The anti-inflammatory properties of these preparations may give quick symptomatic relief to a patient, but they serve as an important cause of persistence and spread of fungal infection in the community.
Despite the extensiveness of their use in India, comprehensive studies on OTC topical medication abuse in dermatophytosis are lacking. We aim to ascertain the growing menace of OTC drug abuse and its implications in dermatophytosis.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This was a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based, pilot study conducted in the dermatology outpatient department (OPD) at a tertiary care center. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee. After obtaining informed consent, 100 consecutive mycologically proven patients with dermatophytosis of all ages and both sexes were recruited. Patients with tinea unguium, illiterate patients, and those unwilling for participation were excluded.
Skin scrapings from all patients were subjected to 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) mount and examined under a microscope for fungal hyphae, the presence of which was considered positive for dermatophyte infection. In doubtful and KOH mount-negative cases, skin scrapings were cultured in Sabouraud's dextrose agar with chloramphenicol and cycloheximide for dermatophytes. A standard validated questionnaire eliciting clinico-demographic variables, characteristics of OTC topical medication use, source of prescription, and their adverse effects was administered to all eligible patients. Patients were then examined by a single observer to determine the pattern of presentation and adverse effects of medications used.
| Results|| |
Our study population consisted of 75 males and 25 females. The mean age of the study population was 31.9 years, ranging from 4 to 72 years. The mean duration of dermatophytosis in our study population was 2.6 months, and 45% of the cases had the disease ranging from 1 to 6 months' duration. Clinical examination of the study population revealed tinea cruris as the most common presentation (44%), followed by tinea corporis (10%), tinea faciei (5%), and an overlap of these in the others [Table 1].
Surprisingly, only 32% of the study population consulted a dermatologist on developing a rash, whereas the majority (68%) used OTC topical medications recommended by pharmacists and friends/relatives, general practitioners, and practitioners of alternative systems of medicine [Table 2].
A total of 33 different commercially available OTC preparations were used. For the ease of analysis, we classified the OTC topical medications into steroid-based preparations, antifungals, and miscellaneous agents. Steroid-based OTC medications were most popular among our study group and majority (77.94%) of the patients used steroid-based preparations, followed by preparations containing salicylic acid, lactic acid, dithranol, coal tar, urea, etc., (14.7%) and some used topical antifungal agents (7.35%) [Figure 1]. Furthermore, about one-third of this group admitted using more than one preparation for their disease. Among the steroid-based preparations, clobetasol propionate was commonly used followed by betamethasone valerate, beclomethasone dipropionate, and fluticasone. Among the topical antifungal agents, miconazole was most commonly used followed by clotrimazole [Table 3].
|Figure 1: Graphical representation of the chief constituent of over-the-counter topical medications used by study population(in percentage)|
Click here to view
Brand names of commonly misused steroid-based preparations were Quadriderm, Fourderm, Betnovate, Panderm, and Candid B, which could be procured OTC without prescription. Irritant preparations like Derobin, Zalim, Sapat, and Salex L were infrequently used.
About 63.23% of the patients using these OTC preparations reported adverse effects on questioning. More than half of these patients (55.81%) had multiple adverse effects. The common adverse effects observed in our study included burning sensation (44.18%), atrophy (30.23%), striae (16.27%), hypopigmentation (23.25%), worsening of rash (30.23%), and contact dermatitis (16.27%) [Table 4].
Furthermore, in our survey, majority (89%) of the patients had never heard of steroids and were not aware of the adverse effects of steroids.
| Discussion|| |
Dermatophytosis is a widely prevalent superficial mycosis in India with a recent upsurge in its incidence and a myriad of atypical presentations due to a complex interplay of agent factors (true resistance, parasitism of vellus hair), host factors (changing clothing habits, ping pong effect within the family, untreated sanctuary sites, casual health-seeking attitude, lack of adherence to standard therapy), and social factors (hesitation to seek medical advice due to involvement of groins, gluteal region, or the inframammary regions).,
In India, several FDC creams are effortlessly available OTC, are cheaper, and give quick symptomatic relief due to the anti-inflammatory properties of steroids. These medicines are recommended by general practitioners, quacks, paramedics, pharmacists, friends, and family without adequate knowledge about the diagnosis and management of dermatophytosis. On achieving some response, patients tend to continue using these products indefinitely and repetitively in case of recurrence.
Adverse effects of injudicious use of topical corticosteroids (TCs) may range from atrophy, hypopigmentation, striae, telangiectasia, hypertrichosis, and acneiform eruptions to more serious systemic side effects due to hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis suppression. Neither the patient nor the pharmacist is aware of these hazards, resulting in an alarming rise in the number of patients approaching dermatologists with these side effects which may sometimes be irreversible. Use of TCs suppresses the local cell-mediated immunity and is also implicated in parasitism of vellus hair., This results in inadequate clearance and increased survival of the dermatophytes which in turn necessitate prolonged duration of treatment or higher dosages of the conventional antifungal agents than that are otherwise required. Use of steroid–antifungal combination should be discouraged in view of the studies that fail to show its superiority to antifungal use alone in dermatophytosis but also due to the abuse potential and serious adverse effects following its long-term use.
Apart from steroids, certain other OTC medications such as Derobin, Zalim, Sapat, and Salex L are frequently applied by patients and their use should be suspected in those with predominantly inflammatory lesions. The commercial advertisements in mass media claiming herbal source and guaranteed effectiveness in all kinds of skin rash attract the patients. In addition, there is a misconception among the public that the irritant response evoked by the above-mentioned agents will cure the disease.
Despite the frequent occurrence of the problem, there is a paucity of comprehensive studies assessing various aspects of OTC topical medication abuse in dermatophytosis. A recent study by Dutta et al. in 100 cases of tinea incognito reported increasing involvement of face and betamethasone dipropionate as the most commonly abused steroid with a large chunk of the prescription from pharmacists (78%). In another study from Delhi, 2174 outpatient department patients were screened for inappropriate use of topical steroids. About 12% of the patients admitted using of TC and dermatophytosis was the leading cause of steroid abuse (38.4%). Betamethasone valerate-based medications were most commonly used with friends/relatives as the common source of prescription (33.2%). Furthermore, a case series of tinea incognito resulting from misuse of potent TCs has been reported by Sheth et al. The rampant inappropriate use of steroids has been emphasized time and again.
This study aimed at assessing all types of OTC topical medication abuse in contrast to previous studies focusing mainly on TC abuse. In addition, our study was exclusively based on patients with dermatophytosis.
In the present study, tinea cruris was the most common clinical presentation (44%), differing from a recent study which reported tinea faciei as the predominant type. This difference could be because of the male predominance who wore occlusive clothing for prolonged periods.
The casual health-seeking attitude of Indian patients is reflected in this study with only one-third (32%) of the patients consulting the dermatologist on developing a skin rash. The data are comparable to the previous studies wherein dermatologists were approached by 14%–40% of patients., The major source of advice for the use of OTC medicines were pharmacists (30.8%) and friends/relatives (29.4%). Pharmacists have been a major source of prescription (20%–78%) in the earlier studies also., Hence, educating pharmacists and general practitioners about the adverse effects of irrational use of OTC medications is crucial.
In this study, 68% of patients used 33 different commercially available OTC medications. TCs were commonly used, and clobetasol-based preparations were predominant unlike other previous Indian studies wherein betamethasone was the most frequently used OTC preparation., Burning sensation was the most common adverse effect experienced by the patients, and clinically, atrophy, striae, eczematous changes, hypopigmentation, and widespread bizarre lesions were most frequently encountered [Figure 2] and [Figure 3]. Burning sensation was more common in patients who used irritants such as salicylic acid, coal tar, and dithranol, indicating irritant contact dermatitis [Figure 4]. In a developing country such as ours, with literacy levels something that we cannot be proud of, it does not come as a surprise that most of the patients (89%) had neither heard of steroids nor were aware of their adverse effects.
|Figure 2: Striae secondary to use of clobetasol based preparation for 12 weeks|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Atrophy and hypopigmentation secondary to use of Betamethasone dipropionate based preparation for 4 weeks|
Click here to view
|Figure 4: Irritant contact dermatitis to Dithranol based preparation used for 4 days|
Click here to view
The growing threat of OTC medication misuse in India is evident from this study. In this direction the Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists and Leprologists has already started a nationwide campaign against topical steroid abuse. It is critical for the drug regulatory agency to keep a check on the availability of rational topical formulations only, minimizing the number of OTC topical preparations and sale of others solely on valid prescriptions.
Health education to create public awareness about irrational drug abuse and its adverse effects is truly the need of the hour. In addition, combined efforts from the drug manufacturer, doctors, and pharmacists supported by stringent drug control policies are of paramount importance in overcoming this hurdle.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Panda S, Verma S. The menace of dermatophytosis in India: The evidence that we need. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2017;83:281-4.
] [Full text]
Dogra S, Uprety S. The menace of chronic and recurrent dermatophytosis in India: Is the problem deeper than we perceive? Indian Dermatol Online J 2016;7:73-6.
] [Full text]
Narang T, Mahajan R, Dogra S. Dermatophytosis: Fighting the challenge: Conference proceedings and learning points. September 2-3, 2017, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. Indian Dermatol Online J 2017;8:527-33.
] [Full text]
Coondoo A. Topical corticosteroid misuse: The Indian scenario. Indian J Dermatol 2014;59:451-5.
] [Full text]
Gómez-Moyano E, Crespo-Erchiga V. Tinea of vellus hair: An indication for systemic antifungal therapy. Br J Dermatol 2010;163:603-6.
Verma S, Madhu R. The great Indian epidemic of superficial dermatophytosis: An appraisal. Indian J Dermatol 2017;62:227-36. [Full text]
Dutta B, Rasul ES, Boro B. Clinico-epidemiological study of tinea incognito with microbiological correlation. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2017;83:326-31.
] [Full text]
Mahar S, Mahajan K, Agarwal S, Kar HK, Bhattacharya SK. Topical corticosteroid misuse: The scenario in patients attending a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:FC16-20.
Sheth HJ, Rathod SP, Chaudhary RG, Malhotra SD, Patel PR. Tinea incognito with unjustified use of potent topical corticosteroids: A case series. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol 2017;6:2087.
Kim WJ, Kim TW, Mun JH, Song M, Kim HS, Ko HC, et al
. Tinea incognito in Korea and its risk factors: Nine-year multicenter survey. J Korean Med Sci 2013;28:145-51.
Ansar A, Farshchian M, Nazeri H, Ghiasian SA. Clinico-epidemiological and mycological aspects of tinea incognito in Iran: A 16-year study. Med Mycol J 2011;52:25-32.
Kumar S, Goyal A, Gupta YK. Abuse of topical corticosteroids in India: Concerns and the way forward. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2016;7:1-5.
] [Full text]
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]